7/26/2023 0 Comments Actiio![]() Strengthen national One Health surveillance efforts to combat resistance.Slow the emergence of resistant bacteria and prevent the spread of resistant infections.CDC addresses its role through its Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions Initiative. The Plan takes a One Health approach, aiming to strengthen healthcare, public health, veterinary medicine, agriculture, food safety, and research and manufacturing. ![]() Government, in partnership with foreign governments, individuals, and organizations. The National Action Plan is organized around five goals for collaborative action by the U.S. government activities, the National Action Plan is also designed to guide action by public health, healthcare, and veterinary partners in a common effort to address urgent and serious antimicrobial-resistant threats that affect people in the U.S. The Plan has pushed transformative improvements that strengthen and expand the response to resistance threats.Īlthough the main purpose is to guide U.S. government’s response to antimicrobial resistance and improve the health of all Americans. National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (referred to as National Action Plan, the Plan, or CARB) presents coordinated, strategic goals to accelerate the U.S. The Commission vote approving the filing of the amicus brief was 3-0.The National Action Plan states that the United States will work domestically and internationally to prevent, detect, and control illness and death related to infections caused by antimicrobial resistance. ![]() The brief notes that the FTC receives thousands of complaints from consumers each year related to discriminatory lending practices. For example, the brief points to the possibility that a lender could display a “Whites Only” sign or turn away Black consumers as they walk in the door. The FTC also argues that the district court’s ruling would have “profoundly negative consequences” for consumers, emboldening discriminatory lenders to openly discourage consumers from applying for loans. The Commission’s brief notes that the anti-discouragement rule-which has stood for nearly 50 years-is authorized by the plain language of ECOA, which mandates that regulators further ECOA’s “purpose” and prevent its “evasion.” In its brief, the FTC argues that the district court’s ruling was incorrect. The district court ruled that the anti-discouragement provision was invalid and that ECOA protects only those consumers who have already applied for credit. The CFPB alleged that the defendants took steps to discourage Black consumers from applying for loans, violating Regulation B’s anti-discouragement rule. Townstone Financial and Barry Sturner, relates to a Chicago-based mortgage lender and its owner, which the CFPB alleged violated Regulation B, the rule that implements ECOA. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit challenging a district court ruling that invalidated a key anti-discrimination rule in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). The Federal Trade Commission filed a friend-of-the-court ( amicus) brief in the U.S. About the FTC Show/hide About the FTC menu items.News and Events Show/hide News and Events menu items.Advice and Guidance Show/hide Advice and Guidance menu items.Competition and Consumer Protection Guidance Documents.Enforcement Show/hide Enforcement menu items.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |